By Amy Penning | Aug 22, 2025
4 minute read Technology| EHR/EMR| Blog
Healthcare CIOs manage a complex ecosystem of clinical, administrative, and operational applications. Hospitals, clinics, and health systems often accumulate a wide array of software over time, ranging from electronic health records (EHRs) and lab systems to billing platforms and legacy imaging tools. Application rationalization, the process of evaluating and streamlining these applications, is not only a cost-saving measure but also a strategic imperative for improving patient care, ensuring regulatory compliance, and enabling effective data archiving.
Healthcare organizations undertake application rationalization to:
This process involves cataloging applications, assessing usage patterns, determining total cost of ownership, and classifying systems for retention, replacement, or retirement.
Once applications are marked for decommissioning, healthcare organizations must address these critical questions: What happens to the data? Where will it go? What do we do with it? This is where archiving becomes essential—not just for storage but having data from legacy systems readily retrievable for helping support continuity of care, legal defensibility, and audit readiness.
The insights from rationalization directly inform a strategic archiving approach:
When healthcare organizations are considering options for long-term data archiving solutions, it’s important to define which application data is accessed regularly vs. data that is accessed very rarely. This allows for greater flexibility in how data is stored, which can ultimately lead to added cost savings. Considering an organization’s size, record volume and access requirements makes it easier to figure out the most suitable archiving method.
While there are many ways to archive your data, making an informed decision is key. Take a moment to review the pros and cons of the many options when determining the best fit for your organization:
Method |
Description |
Pros |
Cons |
Data Migration to Replacement System |
Move data into a new EHR or other application. |
Integrated with current workflows. |
Costly, complex, and may not support all data types. |
Read-Only Repositories |
Store data in secure, non-editable formats (PDF, XML, etc.). |
Cost-effective, compliant, low maintenance. |
Requires significant development effort to build a custom solution from scratch. |
Third-Party Archival Solutions |
Use vendors that specialize in healthcare data archiving. |
Turnkey, compliant, includes audit trails. |
Time and effort needed to evaluate and compare features across different vendors. Potential vendor lock-in, ongoing support costs. |
Hybrid Approach |
Migrate critical data, archive the rest. |
Balanced cost and accessibility. |
Requires careful planning and classification. |
Imaging & Document Management |
Scan or export records into image-based formats. |
Good for static records like charts. |
Exporting or converting data may be technically demanding. Not suitable for structured data or analytics. |
Data Warehousing aka Cold Storage |
Move structured data into a warehouse for reporting. |
Enables long-term analysis and research. |
Not ideal for clinical or real-time use. High cost to build and maintain the DW environment; need to assess ROI compared to current application licensing costs. |
HL7/FHIR-Based Archiving |
Use interoperability standards for archiving and retrieval. |
Future-proof, supports integration. |
Requires technical expertise and standardization. |
Many EHR software vendors will recommend implementation of their product specific EHR-integrated archive. While this may seem a quick and straightforward way, the limitations and costs alone don’t always make this a practical choice. Also, your IT team may be able to use an internally created solution. While internal solutions may answer the immediate need, it’s important to understand limitations and future state. Will this be a system that is scalable to ingest more data as other applications are decommissioned? Does your staff have the bandwidth and knowledge sharing to ensure maintenance and new data ingestion is consistently on the table?
The most popular options out there are popular for good reason. A common approach is to use a third-party archiving solution, which is appealing because the vendor can handle hosting, maintenance, patches, system updates. Another possibility is a self-hosted or a fully owned archiving solution. While this may have infrastructure requirements, many companies do offer hosted environments.
The most popular options out there are popular for good reason. A common approach is to use a third-party archiving solution, which is appealing because the vendor can handle hosting, maintenance, patches, system updates. Another possibility is a self-hosted or a offer hosted environments. For example: CereCore's cloud-based Legacy Data Archive solution is based on standard Microsoft technologies and solves for static data retention requirements from retired systems. While active archiving platforms can source from multiple platforms and serve as the foundation for advanced data lakehouse use cases.
Interested in learning how CereCore can help you move forward with Application Rationalization? Let’s talk.
Explore more resources:
Senior Application Analyst, CereCore
Senior Application Analyst, CereCore
Let us know how we can support your initiatives and take some of the heavy lifting from healthcare IT.
© All Rights Reserved CereCore Terms of Service California Notice at Collection Privacy Policy Responsible Disclosure